Adam Jackson <a...@nwnk.net> writes: > Here's an epoll branch rebased to master, with poll emulation for > Windows, and a pair of proof-of-concept patches at the end to allow > (force) testing on pollful systems:
So you're just emulating poll with select, which should work on Windows. that seems like a good starting place; I'd encourage the Windows hackers to refine that to handle arbitrary numbers of FDs. > I tested this with 32 parallel x11perf -noop's on Linux, and while it > does work, reliable numbers are a bit hard to come by. The x11perf > processes take (wildly) varying amounts of time to complete, such that > the last few runs to complete show inflated nop dispatch rates because > they're competing with fewer clients. I don't know yet how much of that > is X's scheduler and how much is the kernel's. I've been running many instances of 'plaid' in parallel as that doesn't scale it's work based on the server performance. Thanks for taking a stab at this; it looks good to me. I'd love for someone to give it a spin on Windows and make sure it actually works. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel
