On 15 September 2016 at 20:12, Jon Turney <jon.tur...@dronecode.org.uk> wrote: > On 15/09/2016 14:14, Emil Velikov wrote: >> >> On 15 September 2016 at 13:06, Jon Turney wrote: >>> >>> Please consider pulling into master. >>> >>> The following changes since commit >>> 52d6a1e832a5e62289dd4f32824ae16a78dfd7e8: >>> >>> Hold input lock for deviceProc (2016-09-15 07:50:38 +1000) >>> >>> are available in the git repository at: >>> >>> git://people.freedesktop.org/~jturney/xserver >>> >>> for you to fetch changes up to 7280a41ef26647c27035e51e33c6f3ac5b12e931: >>> >>> Add Windows-DRI extension (2016-09-15 12:53:21 +0100) >>> >> Was meaning to mention this (mesa patches to be precise) but other >> things keep on popping: >> >> Where can one find the windowsdriproto package/repo that this depends on ? > > > Like appledriproto, the headers and .pc currently live in mesa (under > src/glx/windows) and are installed by that. > I'm pretty sure I mentioned/suggested the same thing for appledriproto as well ;-)
> I did consider giving it an independent existence, but I'm not sure if > that's wanted: there seemed to be a feeling that there are already too many > proto repos, and it's not like these proto headers are likely to be used by > anything else. > If people are afraid of "too many" proto repos, they always will be - it makes no difference here. Yes, those are not be used by anything else (atm) yet one shouldn't "clump" things based on that merit alone, no ? >> In there configure does not check for windowsdriproto, if the user >> explicitly sets --enable-windowsdri, does it ? >> Shouldn't one be using the windowsdriproto_CFLAGS to point to the headers >> ? > > > Yes, my bad. I'll fix that. Np. Glad I could help. Emil _______________________________________________ xorg-devel@lists.x.org: X.Org development Archives: http://lists.x.org/archives/xorg-devel Info: https://lists.x.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg-devel