On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:06 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 17:11 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: > > > Is there a reason why you didn't commit these patches? > > Owen hasn't tested the second patch yet. Also, it's nice to see if > anyone has comments on the patch before they hit master.
I've tested both patches and they work well as far as I can tell. (Of course, proving that they don't cause obscure problems elsewhere is a lot harder than proving that they fix the problems they were designed to fix.) Also, they make sense to me as patches. I guess I might quibble with the comment in the second one which makes it sounds like this has to do with exotic guffaw scrolling manipulations or something. /* No matter what happened to the parent window bits because of window * and bit gravity, the bits of redirected children are not affected * so no exposures are needed */ ? - Owen _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg