On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Owen Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 09:06 -0700, Keith Packard wrote: >> On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 17:11 +0200, Maarten Maathuis wrote: >> >> > Is there a reason why you didn't commit these patches? >> >> Owen hasn't tested the second patch yet. Also, it's nice to see if >> anyone has comments on the patch before they hit master. > > I've tested both patches and they work well as far as I can tell. > > (Of course, proving that they don't cause obscure problems elsewhere is > a lot harder than proving that they fix the problems they were designed > to fix.) > > Also, they make sense to me as patches. > > I guess I might quibble with the comment in the second one which makes > it sounds like this has to do with exotic guffaw scrolling manipulations > or something. > > /* No matter what happened to the parent window bits because of window > * and bit gravity, the bits of redirected children are not affected > * so no exposures are needed > */ > > ? > > - Owen > > >
If keithp wrote that comment, than perhaps he could improve the comment, because it's not very obvious to me what window gravity does. _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
