uClibc is in heavy development. perhaps you can forward your problems building with uClib to the uClib Mailinglist ?
IMHO the lack of I18N (i do not know the state of uClib here either!) is not a problem since it is designed for memorytight systems where it is unlikly to have i18n at all. re, wh Jim Gettys schrieb: > Does uClibc actually buy you anything? Last I looked, (admittedly quite > a few years ago), it lacked I18N support that most products now require, > at least by the time you are doing serious UI work. But times may have > changed, and it isn't obvious from the sketchy documentation. > > At that date, we ended up having to carry glibc anyway, at which point > it is moot, and uClibc just ended up costing space, rather than saving > it. > - Jim > > > > On Tue, 2008-10-14 at 09:22 -0700, William Tracy wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 14, 2008 at 12:40 AM, John Tapsell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Why not just go for the full X11? Memory wise I found no difference >>> in the memory usage between X11 and kdrive on the OMAP. >> I am told that the full Xorg isn't very happy when built against uClibc. >> >> The original poster probably isn't using uClibc, but can anyone >> comment on building the full server against uClibc? >> _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
