On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Thomas Dickey <dic...@his.com> wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Clemens Eisserer wrote: > >> Hi Charles, >> >> Unfourtunatly XRender is not very well documented, probably the best >> thing available is the specification. > > hmm - googling on that (xrender specification) doesn't find much - just > these random notes here for instance: > > http://keithp.com/~keithp/render/protocol.html > > which only covers a very small fraction of the library. > > (Since it's apparently undocumented - I looked some time ago and concluded > that the documentation covered at most 10% of the code, the "best" thing > available would appear to be the source code - with the caveat that > change-history also appears to be lacking). > >> The reason is that most programmers use higher-level APIs like Cairo >> or QT4 to access XRender, so if you don't have a good reason why you >> directly want to mess with it I recommend using cairo too. > > In that case, a pointer to the detailed api of cairo would help Charles.
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/renderproto/tree/renderproto.txt Alex _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg