On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Alex Deucher <alexdeuc...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Thomas Dickey <dic...@his.com> wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Jan 2009, Clemens Eisserer wrote: >> >>> Hi Charles, >>> >>> Unfourtunatly XRender is not very well documented, probably the best >>> thing available is the specification. >> >> hmm - googling on that (xrender specification) doesn't find much - just >> these random notes here for instance: >> >> http://keithp.com/~keithp/render/protocol.html >> >> which only covers a very small fraction of the library. >> >> (Since it's apparently undocumented - I looked some time ago and concluded >> that the documentation covered at most 10% of the code, the "best" thing >> available would appear to be the source code - with the caveat that >> change-history also appears to be lacking). >> >>> The reason is that most programmers use higher-level APIs like Cairo >>> or QT4 to access XRender, so if you don't have a good reason why you >>> directly want to mess with it I recommend using cairo too. >> >> In that case, a pointer to the detailed api of cairo would help Charles. > > http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/proto/renderproto/tree/renderproto.txt
mis-read you last sentence, this is, of course, the xrender proto, not cairo. Alex _______________________________________________ xorg mailing list xorg@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
