On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:02:10 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:

> Here's the actual patch I meant to send.  What should we do about
> SwapComplete?
> 
I guess for the current (1.3) protocol version, not pretending that
SwapComplete has a sbc_lo field is the easiest, since the server will
never send it anyway.

Cheers,
Julien
_______________________________________________
xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support
Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg
Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg
Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to