On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:02:10 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > Here's the actual patch I meant to send. What should we do about > SwapComplete? > I guess for the current (1.3) protocol version, not pretending that SwapComplete has a sbc_lo field is the easiest, since the server will never send it anyway.
Cheers, Julien _______________________________________________ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com