On Thu, 28 Apr 2011 18:04:58 +0200 Julien Cristau <jcris...@debian.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 09:02:10 -0700, Eric Anholt wrote: > > > Here's the actual patch I meant to send. What should we do about > > SwapComplete? > > > I guess for the current (1.3) protocol version, not pretending that > SwapComplete has a sbc_lo field is the easiest, since the server will > never send it anyway. Yeah, the server will drop part of it; we can just truncate those fields from 8 to 6 bits and make them padding instead. We'll need a new event to send all the bits. -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ xorg@lists.freedesktop.org: X.Org support Archives: http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/xorg Info: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg Your subscription address: arch...@mail-archive.com
