On Thu, 8 Dec 2005, Joel E. Denny wrote:

> > I recommend asking the people of the XSL list [1] about how the most
> > XSTL processors have implemented this. Would be good to go the de facto
> > way here if this is an 'implementation defined' issue.
> > 
> > [1] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Thanks for the suggestion. I will pursue this.

I have started a thread over there.  It has the same subject and is dated 
Dec 9.

Joel
_______________________________________________
xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt

Reply via email to