On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 07:28:19PM -0500, Joel E. Denny wrote: > Do you see XSLT 2.0 in libxslt's future?
Would you implement it ? Me, the answer is no. I don't need it, my employeer has no interest in it, it's foundations are shaky (XSD), it's unclear how much of 1.0 can be reused, and it's way too big for my taste. However it's an open source project, if people want to implement it I'm not against. > In light of the discovery that > keys referencing keys is supposed to be an error in 1.0, are you still > willing to allow it? I'm not happy to violate the spec conciously. > Have you ever considered having a --strict flag (or > --non-strict) for xsltproc to select whether extensions like this should > be permitted? I'm gonna be frank. XSLT-1.0 does not fit your need. You want to sort node set and do maths with it ? Use XPath from a high level *programming language* instead of trying to divert somthing XSLT was not designed for ! Use the right tool for the job ! Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat http://redhat.com/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ _______________________________________________ xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/ [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt
