At 4:00 PM +0200 on 6/22/99, M. Uli Kusterer wrote:
> Scott, what do you say? Anthony? You think you can add this?
Myabe we'd best define in specific terms what this is. But I don't like the
idea pf custom item words at all. It's sort of like declaring variables as
a certain type -- we'd have to manage to remember what these delimiters
are, and it'd get to be a pain when they become complex.
I think I like:
put item <expr> [delimited by <expr> or <expr> or...] [to [item] \
<expr> [ delimited by <expr> or <expr> or...]] of <expr> into \
container
Which does not look all that bad to parse.
- Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: Re: Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: Re: Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: Re: Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: Re: Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: Re: Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters DeRobertis
- Re: Re: Re: Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: xTalk: Delimiters Anonymous
- Re: xTalk: Delimiters Scott Raney
- Re: xTalk: Delimiters Ruediger zu Dohna
- Re: xTalk: Delimiters Rob Cozens
- Re: xTalk: Delimiters DeRobertis
- Re: xTalk: Delimiters Scott Raney
- Re: xTalk: Delimiters Ruediger zu Dohna
