I'm not sure how LTS are defined with Canonical/Ubuntu, but as far as I know will Lubuntu (the youngest addition in the flavor rack) will not have a LTS. Simply because of lacking manpower.
With metta, Chris On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 21:38, Charlie Kravetz <[email protected]>wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 7 Dec 2011 12:26:40 -0800 > Elizabeth Krumbach <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Micah Gersten <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So, as discussed around UDS time, we need to make an official request > > > for Xubuntu to be labeled as an LTS release. > > > Here are what I think we can sanely commit to: > > > > > > 3 yr LTS > > > > Since Ubuntu is switching to 5 year LTS Desktop, are the derivatives > > required to as well to be considered LTS? Or can we have a 3 year LTS? > > > > Per the spec written at UDS and referenced by Micah, we can have 3 year > or 5 year LTS. It is a decision made by the Project Lead when applying > for LTS status. > > - -- > Charlie Kravetz > Linux Registered User Number 425914 [http://counter.li.org/] > Never let anyone steal your DREAM. [http://keepingdreams.com] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJO387bAAoJEFNEIRz9dxbApMsH/A0eZBQdGpuNmjDQovZ9Fhte > OU4KBAg1L23auS9nvy2JnnaE3JIy50F2uLbvZDlh4xWp6bWE4PGCVWd2koHSJk84 > 5FzIh+5UTfWNIKCP0yA/flWx8uIKJK60MR01pkX0zmhHx8cXAJ2ViWLXFpucRqz0 > AvpI14+ixmKLbtwa6Q6M15eAsh7vYDa5S/msjqtExhLcuu5MNl8ZD97NayGzZjs5 > mnsvScsepX7m0hUDcbUcOcedQqSHnWEFJ7/UeYvFqFzHwczVX4rWdNwCU+gCIpl3 > tdAfgkeaSj2UHW62T0WLKQFRUE4gJGGRRlDfLBq3xewtlcxgrAjNOKcmMt4SBzE= > =YQKQ > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- > xubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel >
-- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
