Agreed. The learning curve is too steep for a default editor. If there isn't a good replacement for a default editor, it should be dropped. On Jan 28, 2015 4:37 PM, "Jackson Doak" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'd prefer we dropped gimp, it's a bit too big and complex for the default > install. maybe a lighter editor would be nice though. > > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 9:29 AM, Pasi Lallinaho <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Since we are discussing about other choices in the default seed already, >> it feels like the perfect time to bring yet another discussion to the table: >> >> Do we want to keep shipping GIMP? >> >> For some background, the team has discussed the issue [1] and gone >> through various simpler alternatives [2] for GIMP a few times* in the past, >> but no suitable candidate was found. >> >> Do we think there is a suitable, light and easy-to-use alternative for >> GIMP now? Should we simply drop GIMP altogether and not replace it? >> >> Discuss. >> >> Cheers, >> Pasi >> >> [1] https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/xubuntu-devel/2011-July/007864.html >> [2] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Xubuntu/Roadmap/Specifications/Oneiric/ >> DefaultImageEditor >> * Most of this isn't archived in an easy-to-access way >> >> -- >> Pasi Lallinaho (knome) » http://open.knome.fi/ >> Leader of Shimmer Project » http://shimmerproject.org/ >> Ubuntu member, Xubuntu Website Lead » http://xubuntu.org/ >> >> >> -- >> xubuntu-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel >> > > > -- > xubuntu-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel > >
-- xubuntu-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
