>From: PK <pliniusmi...@gmail.com>
>I have one suggestion to make: the perceived quality of the "brand" Xubuntu
>can perhaps be improved when the only codebase is Ubuntu LTS and its point
>releases. So no more short-lived intermediate releases. Comparable with the
>release policy that Linux Mint has adopted in 2014.
I completely disagree with this. I think the current system is a great balance
between those who want up-to-date software from upstream (but cohesively put
together by Ubuntu and Xubuntu) and those who want to achieve stability by
thoroughly testing what eventually becomes old software. Recommend LTS if you
wish, but don't ditch the six-month release cycle. I try to avoid PPAs (except
for software not in the repositories) for the sake of stability, but I want
up-to-date software. I think sticking with interims is better than LTS+a
smattering of PPAs to get stability and recent front-end software. Others will
disagree, but I want this option and I think it works great for others who are
willing to spend the time it takes to backup and upgrade every six months (as
Ubuntu and Xubuntu work on upgrade stability, hopefully it'll become less
necessary to backup each time, and then an upgrade isn't much more than a big
update).
The Snappy system largely resolves this stable software vs recent software
dilemma that Linux distributions suffers from, but the current system in Ubuntu
does it well enough and I think just sticking with LTS alone would be a step
backwards unless if Xubuntu wants to enable Ubuntu Backports as default and is
willing to make the distinction between back-end and front-end software, stick
to the defined distinction, and work hard with the Ubuntu Backports project to
ensure that software that should be updated (like LibreOffice, GIMP, VLC - but
what about Xfce software? Updating an entire desktop environment on an LTS is
very bold and, if you do that, you might as well update the backend too - you
might as well make a new release - yet Xfce applications are front-end ones and
people will want them updated!) is updated and integrated properly to ensure
stability. Alternatively, Xubuntu should somehow make Snappy the default
package system for applications which use it and try to get as many front-end
applications using it as possible (would probably resolve the dilemma better
than LTS+interim or LTS+Backports). I'm aware that Snappy seems to take up more
hard drive space than APT though, which could be a concern for Xubuntu.
Some people use Xubuntu for its stability and are happy to use older software,
but some (like myself) use it more for the fact that it runs on older hardware
(and maybe because it's lighter on battery and because it uses the traditional
desktop metaphor, largely, and it's generally faster).
I realise that this is a big and wide debate, but I strongly disagree with
going just with LTS unless if significant effort is put into Ubuntu Backports
(as far as I know, Backports aren't frequently updated) or Xubuntu adopts
Snappy (which could have hard drive size issues).
Regards,
Adam
(I use Xubuntu 16.10 on my RM CL 51-15, though not very often now, I admit,
because I have a newer laptop with Ubuntu 16.04. Willing to test on 16.10 if
there's something that needs testing though, spare hardware woop!)
--
xubuntu-devel mailing list
xubuntu-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-devel
