On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 21:30:54 +0800, lukshun...@gmail.com wrote: >On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 04:35 AM, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >> On Tue, 15 Nov 2016 22:28:53 +0800, lukshun...@gmail.com wrote: >>> Ah, that's misleading -- and a bug, IMHO. >> >> I don't think so. The layout of the package search website is the >> same for all packages, if something isn't available, then there are >> simply no mirror servers listed. This makes sense. > >Maybe misleading is too strong a word. :-) > >The information on the page > >https://http://packages.ubuntu.com/xenial/web/browser-plugin-freshplayer-pepperflash > >is confusing, at least to me as a user. If a powerpc package was >successfully built which seems to be the case, I can't understand why >it does not appear in (any of) the repositories. Or did it fail to >build? Or there's in fact no support for powerpc (and other >architectures except x86) and hence it wasn't built at all? If there's >no support, those architectures shouldn't be listed at all.
There is no package because upstream neither provides the source code, nor a binary for this architecture. -- xubuntu-users mailing list xubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/xubuntu-users
