On Wed, 1 Aug 2001 13:30:25 +0200 "Jeroen Breedveld" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do these new attributes have consequences for the append element? Its > child attribute could also be replaced with "before" and "after" > attributes or omitted altogether to append the new node after the last > child like it is now. IMO, to omit the "child" attribute isn't a good idea, because it provides the posibility to append childs in a specified (sorted) manner. What if a user would like to resort the child nodes of a context node? With the attribute "child='first()'" this would be a very easy task. -- ______________________________________________________________________ Lars Martin mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] SMB GmbH http://www.smb-tec.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Post a message: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Contact administrator: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Read archived messages: http://archive.xmldb.org/ ----------------------------------------------------------------------
