Garrett D'Amore wrote: > While this case seems to dance around some of the possible "rules" > about EOFs, possibly violating certain Solaris policies, I believe > that the project team has taken all reasonable precautions to ensure > that the EOF is unlikely to actually affect anyone. > > Therefore I happily give it a +1. Henceforth, let the dead code be > removed! :-) > I wish it didn't, but openjdk requires libXp. Not sure if it matters.
- [xwin-discuss] EOF of Xprint [PSARC/2009/294 Fas... Alan Coopersmith
- [xwin-discuss] EOF of Xprint [PSARC/2009/29... Garrett D'Amore
- [xwin-discuss] EOF of Xprint [PSARC/200... "C. Bergström"
- [xwin-discuss] EOF of Xprint [PSARC... Alan Coopersmith
- [xwin-discuss] EOF of Xprint [PSARC/2009/29... Roland Mainz
- [xwin-discuss] EOF of Xprint [PSARC/200... Alan Coopersmith
- [xwin-discuss] EOF of Xprint [PSARC/2009/29... Alan Coopersmith
