C. Bergstr?m wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>> While this case seems to dance around some of the possible "rules"
>> about EOFs, possibly violating certain Solaris policies, I believe
>> that the project team has taken all reasonable precautions to ensure
>> that the EOF is unlikely to actually affect anyone.
>>
>> Therefore I happily give it a +1. Henceforth, let the dead code be
>> removed! :-)
>>
> I wish it didn't, but openjdk requires libXp. Not sure if it matters.
Nope, since the case explicitly said:
The libXp library that has been shipped in Solaris since Solaris 7 11/99
is declared obsolete, but at this time we have no plans to remove so that
binary compatibility will not be broken.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
