Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> I also think we can finally set the packaging version information to the 
>> true value which is 7.2.0 now, rather than continuing the 
>> downward_to_Solaris10 compatibility nonsense of still taking 6.8.x or 6.9.x 
>> as value:
>>     
>
> The version isn't set like that for any compatibility reason, but simply 
> because
> I hadn't gotten around to changing it.

I have upgraded all the prototype, pkginfo.tmpl and build script files 
to the then current values on Sept 30th 2007.
Also the license headers.
I still have to go through all the Makefiles at some point in the 
future. But they are obviously not all that important, as no customer 
gets to ever see them (as they are not part of any pkg, except we would 
also offer a src snapshot in pkgadd format, which we possibly should do, 
too).

>     I was actually planning to change it
> to "11" so that it wasn't confused with the Xorg version number, since they
> aren't tied together, especially with the current Solaris package/patch 
> system.
> (Perhaps the IPS system will rectify this, so we don't have situations like we
>   

Okay, that will work.

>  do now on Solaris 10, where the package versions are 6.8.0, but contain Xorg
>  7.2, since the package versions don't change after the release ships and all
>  further updates move to patches.)
>   
Yeah.
Aren't there some extensions to the SVR4 pkgadd framework in the planning?
One should contact the responsible group, if any, to address this issue.
>   
>> p.s. I'm going to leave xkb where I, personally, currently have it, inside 
>> SUNWxorg-data (partially derived from Moinak's work).
>> You can later still adjust the Makefiles and pkgdefs to your wishes, 
>> removing something is done quickly. For now it has to work and has to be 
>> re-distributable by 3rd parties (BeleniX, MartUX, Indiana, SchilliX, 
>> Nextenda, YouNameIt_*niX). And it currently meets both of these 
>> requirements. I'm wondering, why you are referencing next to 40 packages in 
>> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/fox/fox-gate/XW_NV/make_release_packages,
>>  while only 23 pkgdefs are contained in your FOX src:
>> http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/fox/fox-gate/XW_NV/packages/
>> Or are the missing pkgdefs (and src?) those, you had mentioned some time ago 
>> and want to publish soon?
>>     
>
> No, I don't even know where the SUNWxorg-xkb source & pkgdefs are any more,
> I'd have to ask g11n for those.
>   

Thanks for contacting g11n.
Yup, the Non-sun sources don't properly work on SPARC (tested with Type 
6 USB and MiniDIN6 kbds, while they do work on the Tadpole's embedded 
kbd, for some strange reason.
Mounting a Sun-provided /usr/X11/lib/X11/xkb over instantly made it work 
again on the then running test systems U60, U30, SB100).
Sun's original mapfile alone did not do the trick.
> The pkgdefs I've promised to publish are for the packages like SUNWxwplt,
> so you can see what's left to replace.
>
>   


--
Regards
%martin

Reply via email to