> > Why are you removing the Trusted Extensions patch? > > > > This should actually be configurable. I am > building on a system > that does not have the Nevada X11 packages to > verify that FOX > is self-hosting. Building Xtsol is dependent on > some components > that are not open so the build fails. So I > commented this to get > the build to succeed. > The application of this patch and building Xtsol > should be > configurable.
It would even fail on a full SXCR_sparc_snv_70 (that's what I'm using, didn't test any other build or platform)., complete oem cluster, all languages, all trusted extensions - pkgs from SXCR-dvd installed (though not configured, which prevents a binary tsol module from being loaded). As mentioned two weeks ago, the tsol subdir would always fail and would break the compile of the entire server circa 30 times. It wasnt a conflicting funtion prototype vs. definition, but a struct (mistake in my mail from back then). But a patch to work around this is included in my diffs. Commenting out the tsol patch did not help on snv_70. There are some more clear *bugs* in /usr/include. I need to file them, afterwards ... -- %martin This message posted from opensolaris.org
