Joseph Kowalski wrote:
>
> A couple of questions - *very* high level ones (which may just mean I'm
> missing something):
>
> 1) We have the Vino client. Here we are integrating the RealVNC server.
> Why are we mixing and matching here? RealVNC provides a very
> similar client (or two it seems).
Vino actually uses the RealVNC jar files, it just provides integration with
the GNOME desktop for that VNC client software. (To answer another offline
question, this is why Vino is listed in the imported interfaces - instead
of shipping a second copy of those jar files, if you start Xvnc with -httpd,
it will serve the Vino-provided copy of the RealVNC jar files.)
> 2) Volatile seems low for this, based on my "meager, but non-null"
> understanding
> of the RealVNC project. Is this a "keep it Volatile for now,
> higher later" type
> of thing or is there some other reason?
Simply that I have no feeling about the level of interface stability that
RealVNC maintains.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
