Peter Tribble wrote:
> On 10/3/07, Joseph Kowalski <jek3 at sun.com> wrote:
>> A couple of questions - *very* high level ones (which may just mean I'm
>> missing something):
>>
>> 1) We have the Vino client. Here we are integrating the RealVNC server.
>> Why are we mixing and matching here? RealVNC provides a very
>> similar client (or two it seems).
>
> Ugh. We should ship the (native, not java) RealVNC client, and remove the
> vino client. There are significant differences in functionality and
> performance.
That's an issue to raise with the JDS team, not this case. I know
there's been recent discussion about moving from Vino to Vinagre,
especially if the GNOME community adopts Vinagre as part of the
official platform, but I don't know how the two compare.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System Engineering
