On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:08:52PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Edward Pilatowicz wrote: > > so i'll file a bug against usb saying it should allow suspend of devices > > that are not present. > > > > should i also file a new bug against X in the same cat/subcat as > > 6844148? > > I'm not sure what X could do differently here - what would that bug say? >
from my reading of 6844148, it's almost like the fix failed. it seems like when i unplugged the mouse, X should have gotten ENODEV and then closed the mouse device. but from the pfiles output we see that the device isn't being closed. if i was going to file a bug it would say that X should close the device. is there some other behavior that you think should be happening here? ed
