Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 01:08:52PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
>> Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
>>> so i'll file a bug against usb saying it should allow suspend of devices
>>> that are not present.
>>>
>>> should i also file a new bug against X in the same cat/subcat as
>>> 6844148?
>> I'm not sure what X could do differently here - what would that bug say?
>>
>
> from my reading of 6844148, it's almost like the fix failed. it seems
> like when i unplugged the mouse, X should have gotten ENODEV and then
> closed the mouse device. but from the pfiles output we see that the
> device isn't being closed. if i was going to file a bug it would say
> that X should close the device. is there some other behavior that you
> think should be happening here?
X won't get ENODEV until select() returns that there's something to read
on the device and we attempt to read() from it. If neither the kernel
nor HAL somehow signal X, we'll never notice.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at oracle.com
Oracle Solaris Platform Engineering: X Window System
