> > Another note : I just realized that I probably failed to reply to some > questions in the past, concerning the local coordinate system of contacts. > If a local coordinate system is needed, it is handled gracefully in SCGeom, > which IS tracking the orientation of the local coordinate system, > independant of any incremental/total formulation. I understood this fact had > been overlooked while reading this sentence in the doc "A special > (mis)feature of DEM is that each contact is oriented only by two points, > current positions of both particles (\currC_1 and \currC_2)". First, it is > by no mean a "DEM misfeature" (see PFC3D manual), second is not even a Yade > misfeature. > Good to hear this writing about the necessity of a local system at the contact level. Bruno, is this somehow implicit in ScGeom formulation?
thanks, Chiara > > > -- > _______________ > Bruno Chareyre > Associate Professor > Grenoble INP > Lab. 3SR > BP 53 - 38041, Grenoble cedex 9 - France > Tél : 33 4 56 52 86 21 > Fax : 33 4 76 82 70 43 > ________________ > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > Post to : [email protected] > Unsubscribe : > https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev<https://launchpad.net/%7Eyade-dev> > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-dev More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
