Question #701438 on Yade changed:
https://answers.launchpad.net/yade/+question/701438

    Status: Needs information => Answered

Jan Stránský proposed the following answer:
Hello,

please read [3], section "Please, no external links!".
MWE can be put directly in the question (assuming satisfying M=minimal 
condition).

> even dt is small enough compared to the dt obtained from PWaveTimeStep()
> If I understood correctly, when dt is small enough, different dt should not 
> affect the results. Do you have any ideas about it?

Straightforward answer could be that it is not small enough to neglect
the effect of its value

But, more importantly:
You are examining a few "random" particle's velocities in a simulation with 
"many" particles. 
Such DEM simulation is "chaotic", i.e. a small change in input may lead to big 
changes for such quantities like velocity or position of one individual 
particle.
You can try running exactly the same simulation (same O.dt, same initial 
configuration, everything the same) in parallel, let's say with "-j 4" option 
and you should get different result for each run [4].
So what you are experiencing with different velocities is the feature of DEM 
and its computer solution.

So you should be interested in some "overall" quantities, like average
velocity of some band or region of particles

Concerning premature exit, I have no idea.
The log files of those simulations does not contain the line "Running 
finished". But it has status: 0 (OK) result. So it must have been stopped 
somehow differently than by stopSimulation() function..

Cheers
Jan

[3] https://www.yade-dem.org/wiki/Howtoask
[4] https://yade-dem.org/doc/formulation.html#result-indeterminism

-- 
You received this question notification because your team yade-users is
an answer contact for Yade.

_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
Post to     : yade-users@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~yade-users
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp

Reply via email to