On 3/4/2010 2:18 PM, S Moonesamy wrote:
Hi Dave, Alexey forwarded the Secdir review to the list ( http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00366.html ). The Secdir reviewer clarified his comments ( http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam/current/msg00368.html ).
Since Steve Kent is sitting a few feet away from me, here in Kuala Lumpur, I should probably chat with him about this...
The problem is that I'm not sure what to discuss. His followup note does indicate that he has a reasonable and narrow set of concerns. The real problem is that I am not sure what boundaries we -- yam -- have for these kinds of changes.
One argument is that he is suggesting non-normative clarifications. From that standpoint, that seems reasonable to include for yam-related work.
A different argument is that there is, nonetheless, some actual substance to the changes and that that is /not/ within scope for yam.
How does the wg feel about this? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net _______________________________________________ yam mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
