> One argument is that he is suggesting non-normative clarifications. From > that standpoint, that seems reasonable to include for yam-related work. > > A different argument is that there is, nonetheless, some actual substance to > the changes and that that is /not/ within scope for yam. > > How does the wg feel about this?
This WG participant feels great about having you discuss it with him, use your judgment, and make a recommendation to the WG about what we should do. Barry _______________________________________________ yam mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
