On 09/Jun/10 13:47, John C Klensin wrote:
[publishing pre-evaluation documents as Informational RFCs]While I may be missing something, I don't see the value proposition that justifies that extra work in this case.
+1. It would clutter the RFC series somewhat. JM2C _______________________________________________ yam mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
