On 6/10/2010 2:51 PM, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
I am talking about IESG voting comments in datatracker.
I think it is important for the community to know how each AD voted and
which comments (blocking and non-blocking) were made.
My desire for less formal work notwithstanding, I'd like to support your goal.
However I suggest that it needs to be cast in a framework that considers the
full range of IETF management activities that should be available in archival
format. In other words, this should not be considered as an isolated
requirement, and almost certainly not in terms of this wg.
With a coherent view of such things, we can work forward, to make sure that each
bit really is available long term. This will almost certainly not require
changes in the formal, daily work of any IETF participant but will, rather,
entail a set of back-end procedures for formal IETF archiving rules.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
