As indicated in my previous message with notes from Maastricht, the
ramifications of Russ Housley's "two track" proposal were discussed
there. See the slides for a summary of the issues at
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/78/materials.html#wg-yam.
At the end of the meeting, three questions were discussed:
1) should the YAM working group continue working at its current
rate on its current doc set?
2) should the YAM working group "hit the pause button"?
3) should the YAM working group shut down?
Absolutely no one supported the last item, #3. However, the room was
fairly evenly split between support for both #1 and #2.
Please respond to this message with an indication of your support for
either #1 (working apace) or #2 (pausing), as well as why.
If you support #2 (pausing), please also discuss how long of a pause you
feel is appropriate and why.
Tony Hansen
YAM co-chair
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
