At 21:01 09-08-10, Tony Hansen wrote:
At the end of the meeting, three questions were discussed:
1) should the YAM working group continue working at its current
rate on its current doc set?
2) should the YAM working group "hit the pause button"?
3) should the YAM working group shut down?
Absolutely no one supported the last item, #3. However, the room was
fairly evenly split between support for both #1 and #2.
Option #1 could be rewritten as "will the document editors continue
working on the documents at the current rate".
Option #1 could also be rewritten as - "will the IESG evaluate the
pre-evaluation I-Ds and drafts submitted by the YAM working group
painlessly and in a timely manner".
The "success in the WG [also] requires that there be a good-faith
commitment by both its participants and the IESG". It is unclear
whether there will be a two-track level, STDs or good-faith commitment.
I support option #2.
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
