Hi Derek,
At 13:58 26-05-2011, Derek Diget wrote:
2) I am not sure if a mention to RFC 6186 - Use of SRV Records for
Locating Email Submission/Access Services and its section 3.1
would be appropriate in this RFC? Say, by adding something like the
following to section 3.1:
A site [can|SHOULD?] publish the SRV record that provides a client
the site's preferred submission port [RFC6186].
RFC 6186 is a Proposed Standard and it only a few months old. It may
be premature to introduce such a requirement at this maturity
level. I would wait for an interoperability report at the very least.
I don't know whether you will find the message at
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf/current/msg63012.html useful. :-)
Regards,
-sm
_______________________________________________
yam mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam
