+1 for merge

-Rohith Sharma K S

On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 18:01, Naganarasimha Garla <
naganarasimha...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi All,
>          Thanks for feedback folks, based on the positive response starting
> a Vote thread for merging YARN-3409 to master.
>
> Regards,
> + Naga & Sunil
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 2:51 am Wangda Tan, <wheele...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 for the merge, it gonna be a great addition to 3.2.0 release. Thanks
> to
> > everybody for pushing this feature to complete.
> >
> > Best,
> > Wangda
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 8:25 AM Bibinchundatt <bibin.chund...@huawei.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> +1 for merge. Fetaure would be a good addition to 3.2 release.
> >>
> >> --------------------------------------------------
> >> Bibin A Chundatt
> >> M: +91-9742095715<tel:+91-9742095715>
> >> E: bibin.chund...@huawei.com<mailto:bibin.chund...@huawei.com>
> >> 2012<tel:2012>实验室-印研IT&Cloud BU分部
> >> 2012<tel:2012> Laboratories-IT&Cloud BU Branch Dept.
> >> From:Naganarasimha Garla
> >> To:common-...@hadoop.apache.org,Hdfs-dev,yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org,
> >> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org,
> >> Date:2018-08-29 20:00:44
> >> Subject:[Discuss] Merge discussion for Node attribute support feature
> >> YARN-3409
> >>
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> We would like to hear your thoughts on merging “Node Attributes Support
> in
> >> YARN” branch (YARN-3409) [2] into trunk in a few weeks. The goal is to
> get
> >> it in for HADOOP 3.2.
> >>
> >> *Major work happened in this branch*
> >>
> >> YARN-6858. Attribute Manager to store and provide node attributes in RM
> >> YARN-7871. Support Node attributes reporting from NM to RM( distributed
> >> node attributes)
> >> YARN-7863. Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> >> YARN-7875. Node Attribute store for storing and recovering attributes
> >>
> >> *Detailed Design:*
> >>
> >> Please refer [1] for detailed design document.
> >>
> >> *Testing Efforts:*
> >>
> >> We did detailed tests for the feature in the last few weeks.
> >> This feature will be enabled only when Node Attributes constraints are
> >> specified through SchedulingRequest from AM.
> >> Manager implementation will help to store and recover Node Attributes.
> >> This
> >> works with existing placement constraints.
> >>
> >> *Regarding to API stability:*
> >>
> >> All newly added @Public APIs are @Unstable.
> >>
> >> Documentation jira [3] could help to provide detailed configuration
> >> details. This feature works from end-to-end and we tested this in our
> >> local
> >> cluster. Branch code is run against trunk and tracked via [4].
> >>
> >> We would love to get your thoughts before opening a voting thread.
> >>
> >> Special thanks to a team of folks who worked hard and contributed
> towards
> >> this efforts including design discussion / patch / reviews, etc.: Weiwei
> >> Yang, Bibin Chundatt, Wangda Tan, Vinod Kumar Vavilappali, Konstantinos
> >> Karanasos, Arun Suresh, Varun Saxena, Devaraj Kavali, Lei Guo, Chong
> Chen.
> >>
> >> [1] :
> >>
> >>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12937633/Node-Attributes-Requirements-Design-doc_v2.pdf
> >> [2] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3409
> >> [3] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7865
> >> [4] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8718
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> + Naga & Sunil Govindan
> >>
> >
>

Reply via email to