+1 for the merge

On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 12:06 PM Rohith Sharma K S <
rohithsharm...@apache.org> wrote:

> +1 for merge
>
> -Rohith Sharma K S
>
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 18:01, Naganarasimha Garla <
> naganarasimha...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >          Thanks for feedback folks, based on the positive response
> starting
> > a Vote thread for merging YARN-3409 to master.
> >
> > Regards,
> > + Naga & Sunil
> >
> > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 2:51 am Wangda Tan, <wheele...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 for the merge, it gonna be a great addition to 3.2.0 release. Thanks
> > to
> > > everybody for pushing this feature to complete.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Wangda
> > >
> > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 8:25 AM Bibinchundatt <
> bibin.chund...@huawei.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> +1 for merge. Fetaure would be a good addition to 3.2 release.
> > >>
> > >> --------------------------------------------------
> > >> Bibin A Chundatt
> > >> M: +91-9742095715<tel:+91-9742095715>
> > >> E: bibin.chund...@huawei.com<mailto:bibin.chund...@huawei.com>
> > >> 2012<tel:2012>实验室-印研IT&Cloud BU分部
> > >> 2012<tel:2012> Laboratories-IT&Cloud BU Branch Dept.
> > >> From:Naganarasimha Garla
> > >> To:common-...@hadoop.apache.org,Hdfs-dev,yarn-dev@hadoop.apache.org,
> > >> mapreduce-...@hadoop.apache.org,
> > >> Date:2018-08-29 20:00:44
> > >> Subject:[Discuss] Merge discussion for Node attribute support feature
> > >> YARN-3409
> > >>
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> We would like to hear your thoughts on merging “Node Attributes
> Support
> > in
> > >> YARN” branch (YARN-3409) [2] into trunk in a few weeks. The goal is to
> > get
> > >> it in for HADOOP 3.2.
> > >>
> > >> *Major work happened in this branch*
> > >>
> > >> YARN-6858. Attribute Manager to store and provide node attributes in
> RM
> > >> YARN-7871. Support Node attributes reporting from NM to RM(
> distributed
> > >> node attributes)
> > >> YARN-7863. Modify placement constraints to support node attributes
> > >> YARN-7875. Node Attribute store for storing and recovering attributes
> > >>
> > >> *Detailed Design:*
> > >>
> > >> Please refer [1] for detailed design document.
> > >>
> > >> *Testing Efforts:*
> > >>
> > >> We did detailed tests for the feature in the last few weeks.
> > >> This feature will be enabled only when Node Attributes constraints are
> > >> specified through SchedulingRequest from AM.
> > >> Manager implementation will help to store and recover Node Attributes.
> > >> This
> > >> works with existing placement constraints.
> > >>
> > >> *Regarding to API stability:*
> > >>
> > >> All newly added @Public APIs are @Unstable.
> > >>
> > >> Documentation jira [3] could help to provide detailed configuration
> > >> details. This feature works from end-to-end and we tested this in our
> > >> local
> > >> cluster. Branch code is run against trunk and tracked via [4].
> > >>
> > >> We would love to get your thoughts before opening a voting thread.
> > >>
> > >> Special thanks to a team of folks who worked hard and contributed
> > towards
> > >> this efforts including design discussion / patch / reviews, etc.:
> Weiwei
> > >> Yang, Bibin Chundatt, Wangda Tan, Vinod Kumar Vavilappali,
> Konstantinos
> > >> Karanasos, Arun Suresh, Varun Saxena, Devaraj Kavali, Lei Guo, Chong
> > Chen.
> > >>
> > >> [1] :
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12937633/Node-Attributes-Requirements-Design-doc_v2.pdf
> > >> [2] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-3409
> > >> [3] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7865
> > >> [4] : https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8718
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> + Naga & Sunil Govindan
> > >>
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Weiwei Yang

Reply via email to