[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7307?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16201076#comment-16201076
]
Wangda Tan commented on YARN-7307:
----------------------------------
Also, instead of adding new dynamic resources fields to ResourceUtils, can we
leverage {{initializeResourcesFromResourceInformationMap}} and directly update
local types information after {{List<ResourceTypeInfo>}} received from RM?
If you do think we should client to opt-out loading resource-types.xml, instead
of adding new option to yarn-site.xml, we can add a API to ResourceUtils to
opt-in load resource-types.xml (by default it won't load), and we can update
ResourceManager/NodeManager to opt-in only.
> Revisit resource-types.xml loading behaviors
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-7307
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-7307
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Components: nodemanager, resourcemanager
> Reporter: Wangda Tan
> Assignee: Sunil G
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: YARN-7307.001.patch
>
>
> Existing feature requires every client has a resource-types.xml in order to
> use multiple resource types, should we allow client/AM update supported
> resource types via Yarn APIs?
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org
