[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8898?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16685637#comment-16685637
 ] 

Botong Huang commented on YARN-8898:
------------------------------------

For the record, I was leaning towards Solution 2 later in the discussion :)
{quote}Anyways, it might be cleaner to go for Solution 2.
{quote}
In _FederationStateStore_ there's already an application table, we can 
piggyback in it (_ApplicationHomeSubCluster_). I think for future compatibility 
we should just put the _ApplicationSubmissionContext_ object in it, rather than 
creating a new trimmed type. If by trimming you meant setting some of the 
entries to null, then sure by all means.

> Fix FederationInterceptor#allocate to set application priority in 
> allocateResponse
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-8898
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-8898
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Sub-task
>            Reporter: Bibin A Chundatt
>            Assignee: Bilwa S T
>            Priority: Major
>         Attachments: YARN-8898.wip.patch
>
>
> In case of FederationInterceptor#mergeAllocateResponses skips 
> application_priority in response returned



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to