[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-947?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13801605#comment-13801605
]
Mayank Bansal commented on YARN-947:
------------------------------------
BTW yarnapplicationattemptstate is already part of YARN-978.
I think we should use the same states In AHS as we have in RM and we don't
think we should use others states then RM states as thats what we show users to
RM UI/CLI to avoid confusion.
Thoughts?
> Defining the history data classes for the implementation of the
> reading/writing interface
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: YARN-947
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-947
> Project: Hadoop YARN
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Reporter: Zhijie Shen
> Assignee: Zhijie Shen
> Fix For: YARN-321
>
> Attachments: YARN-947.1.patch, YARN-947.2.patch, YARN-947.3.patch,
> YARN-947.4.patch, YARN-947.5.patch
>
>
> We need to define the history data classes have the exact fields to be
> stored. Therefore, all the implementations don't need to have the duplicate
> logic to exact the required information from RMApp, RMAppAttempt and
> RMContainer.
> We use protobuf to define these classes, such that they can be ser/des
> to/from bytes, which are easier for persistence.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
