[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15389859#comment-15389859
 ] 

Wangda Tan commented on YARN-4945:
----------------------------------

[~eepayne], I totally agree that intra-queue preemption should happen only if 
applications belong to the queue cannot get resource outside of the queue.

These bounds are: resources / partitions / user-limits. However, I think for 
non-accountable (like First-come-first-serve) usage, for example locality, 
should not trigger preemption. Preemption of FCFS usages could lead to 
excessive-preemption.

And [~sunilg] is also working on a POC / design, I think you can collaborate on 
this. Sunil, could you give some brief updates of the POC/design efforts?

> [Umbrella] Capacity Scheduler Preemption Within a queue
> -------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: YARN-4945
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/YARN-4945
>             Project: Hadoop YARN
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Wangda Tan
>
> This is umbrella ticket to track efforts of preemption within a queue to 
> support features like:
> YARN-2009. YARN-2113. YARN-4781.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: yarn-issues-unsubscr...@hadoop.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: yarn-issues-h...@hadoop.apache.org

Reply via email to