Counterpunch.png

 

 

Hong Kong

 

Socialism or "Scholarism"?

 

 

Luciana Bohne, Counterpunch, USA, 3 October 2014

 

I woke up this morning to read the news in the Guardian that the pope
believes in angels. I took the headline on faith, and moved on. The Guardian
introduced me to Joshua Wong
<http://www.theguardian.com/profile/taniabranigan> , leader of the "the
spontaneous nature of the civil disobedience," in Hong Kong, as if to
illustrate the pope's charming belief.

 

Joshua Wong, I'm told, is the seventeen-year-old "co-founder of Scholarism,
the student movement which kickstarted [sic] the demonstrations," in Hong
Kong. At fifteen, Joshua (I may be permitted the first name?) founded the
movement in protest to Beijing's proposal to introduce "national education,"
which Joshua's supporters believe is "brainwashing."

 

I assume, the "brainwashing," would be free, Beijing not being on a course
of manic privatization-of-everything that I've heard of. In the United
States, "brainwashing," if we're talking of university, is liberally and
democratically available as the road to lifelong indebtedness-and scarce
income. If Joshua is not aware of the perils of education in the
self-proclaimed freest and most democratic society in the world, he, too,
may believe in angels.

 

In fact, the Guardian describes him as one. A model of filial devotion to
quiet, retiring middle-class parents, Roger and Grace, also, incidentally,
veteran "pro-democracy" activists-modest and discreetly morose about his
meteoric hurtling into global fame, Joshua's apparel is the very opposite of
that of Che's, arguably the most endurably visible revolutionary in the
world, himself devoted to a "brainwashing" form of education, albeit that of
a "New Man," who would revolutionize consciousness and change the world.
Che's educational program was called "socialism," an alternative form of
organizing society that American education never speaks of. Here's how the
Guardian makes its fashion statement about Joshua's sartorial paraphernalia,
the very model of a typical, though not noticeably anti-capitalist, "occupy"
teenager:

 

With his floppy hair, baggy shorts and stripy T-shirt, accessorized [sic]
with a yellow ribbon around each skinny wrist, the only thing distinguishing
the 17-year-old from the other teenagers on Wednesday was the bank of
television cameras facing him.

 

An "oriental" Maoist, this icon is not. Relax, readers. The Guardian informs
with a polite, suppressed shudder, that 

 

the Hong Kong demonstrations were triggered after the Chinese government
restricted who can run as the commercial hub's next chief executive, or
leader.

 

Notice, readers: "restricted who can run." Fiendish autocracy of Beijing.
The Guardian, being a British newspaper, may be forgiven for not noting that
in the United States, the "central government" is made up of two business
parties, which restrict the electoral choice of presidents to two
candidates, both of whose pockets are stuffed with million of lobby
dollars-well over half a billion in Obama's case in 2008 - in order to win a
popularity race that will make not a bit of difference to the citizens at
home and America's imperial hostages abroad.

 

Undaunted by tonal deafness and attention to comparative logic, the Guardian
trudges on:

 

Chinese state media have attacked Scholarism as extremists and a pro-Beijing
Hong Kong-based paper claimed that "US forces" had worked to cultivate Wong
as a "political superstar" - accusations Wong has dismissed.

 

Now what has given the "pro-Beijing Hong Kong paper" such an outrageous
idea? When has the US ever meddled with the internal affairs of a foreign
country? Has it been listening to Putin's propaganda, denigrating the
splendid "civil society" success of the supposed American coup in Kiev last
February? Has it been heeding the testimony of the "shocked" OSCE human
rights observers on 29 September that grossly mutilated bodies of civilians
are being exhumed in the vicinity of rebel Donetsk-one allegedly a pregnant
woman and another woman decapitated, among other reportedly unidentifiable
remains? Or Russian Foreign Minister's Lavrov's figure of over 400 corpses
found in mass graves in territories recently vacated in haste by the alleged
US-sponsored "fascist" rabble of the Ukrainian National Guard? Does Beijing
believe victim testimony of repeated mass rapes, including of girls as young
as twelve, by the Ukrainian anti-terrorist fascist battalions in villages
around Donetsk? Is Beijing so credulous as to credit Amnesty International's
confirmation of human rights abuses in East Ukraine? If so, goodness,
Beijing might believe that serial US-funded "color revolutions," starting in
Yugoslavia in the 1990s, have manipulated the members of the former Warsaw
Pact into serving the NATO alliance in its encirclement of Russia. The
Chinese central government might even go so far as to suppose that President
Obama's "pivot to Asia" requires a first stop in Moscow before proceeding to
"color revolution" in Beijing.

 

Crazy. Speaking of which, I have a message for the Guardian, which is
inscribed on a plaque hanging in my kitchen, the gift of a fan of Jack
Nicholson's wisdom in "As Good as It Gets": "Go sell crazy somewhere else.
We're all stocked up here."

 

All the Guardian really needed to report for us to get the true picture was
one telling fact: the budget allocated to Hong Kong by the CIA's National
Endowment for Democracy
<http://www.ned.org/where-we-work/asia/china-hong-kong>  (NED).

 

-   Luciana Bohne is co-founder of Film Criticism, a journal of cinema
studies, and teaches at Edinboro University in Pennsylvania. She can be
reached at: [email protected]

 

 

From: http://www.counterpunch.org/2014/10/03/our-boys-in-hong-kong/

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to