Daily Maverick New.png

 

 

Get Guptas, duck Zuma: SACP's obstacle race on state capture

 

 

Ranjeni Munusamy, Daily Maverick, Johannesburg, 6 June 2016

 

Out of a 2,386-word media statement on the SACP's central committee meeting
this weekend, 1,371 words were on the issue of state capture. Clearly the
matter dominated discussions at the three-day meeting, and the SACP has no
intention to back down on its criticism of the Gupta family. 

 

The SACP's second deputy general-secretary Solly Mapaila has been throwing
killer punches since the ANC announced it was shutting down its internal
investigation into state capture, calling this a whitewash and declaring
that the SACP could not be "in an alliance with factions and corrupt
syndicates in the organisation".

 

There was always the chance that the central committee would decide to tone
down the SACP's approach and seek a more conciliatory position to appease
its alliance partner.

 

Instead, the central committee came out quite explicitly that it supported
Mapaila's "forthright" statements. "The CC commended in particular our
second national deputy general-secretary, Comrade Solly Mapaila, for his
forthright condemnation of those, like the Gupta family, involved in the
most brazen forms of buying political influence and of even directly seeking
to usurp executive powers." The SACP said it was "misguided" for those in
the ANC's leadership "who now seek to dismiss concern about corporate
capture as if it were just a marginal issue".

 

.

 

This central committee statement was fascinating for another reason. It
aimed to forcefully confront the issue of state capture and the interference
of the Guptas in government affairs while circling the question of how the
family might have access to privileged information. The SACP speaks
critically of the Cabinet reshuffle in December 2015, when Nhlanhla Nene was
fired as finance minister, without referring to who fired Nene.

 

Suggestions

 

"The parasitic bourgeoisie's rent-seeking greed clearly knows absolutely no
bounds. They are quite prepared to loot our economy into a Zimbabwean-style
failed economic scenario. There are suggestions that, with insider
knowledge, some have deliberately 'shorted' the rand - that is,
speculatively driven down the rand's exchange value. They are clearly
prepared to cut-and-run to Dubai leaving behind the wreckage. This activity
poses a threat to the livelihoods of the great majority of South Africans,
wiping out the value of pensions and other savings, amongst other things."

 

How would those who cut-and-ran to Dubai have had "insider knowledge" of
Nene's firing so that they could deliberately short the rand? There is, of
course, only one person with the prerogative to hire and fire Cabinet
members. When asked this, SACP deputy general secretary Jeremy Cronin said
the Guptas "boast a great deal" about their knowledge of what is going to
happen. The SACP general-secretary Blade Nzimande then clarified: "We are
not saying the Cabinet reshuffle was inspired by the parasitic bourgeoisie.
There are those who saw it as opportunity to capture Treasury."

 

In other words, they are not pointing fingers at President Jacob Zuma. But
there was also some fuzziness and subtext later in the statement.

 

The SACP says it played a leading role from within the alliance "in exposing
the Guptas (and other instruments of parasitism) and in defending Treasury
without simply becoming the cheerleaders for factions of monopoly capital or
their comprador BEE associates".

 

"It is precisely this positioning by the SACP that has also prevented
monopoly capital from walking away with a clear-cut victory from the events
of December when the president was compelled to replace the newly appointed
Minister of Finance with a former Minister of Finance, Comrade Pravin
Gordhan."

 

So whose interests was the president serving when he appointed Des van
Rooyen before he was "compelled" to replace him? And how would the Guptas
get control of the Treasury without political assistance?

 

Revealed

 

Nzimande revealed that Zuma phoned SACP and COSATU leaders before announcing
that he was firing Nene on Wednesday, 9 December. He also confirmed that
alliance leaders met with Zuma two days later to discuss the "effects" of
the firing. This was among the meetings that weekend that led to Zuma
announcing on the Sunday night that Gordhan was the new minister of finance.

 

Gordhan, incidentally, addressed the SACP central committee meeting on
"current global and domestic economic challenges". The Hawks investigation
against him regarding the special investigating unit operating at the South
African Revenue Service when Gordhan was commissioner was apparently not
discussed.

 

But Cronin said the SACP found it "extremely distasteful that comrades we
worked with in the '70s and '80s are being targeted by operatives of
apartheid regime, particularly the security branch". He said it was
"hurtful" that struggle activists were "targeted by dark forces".

 

Regarding the closure of bank accounts of Gupta companies, Cronin said while
the SACP was not a fan of the big four banks, it appeared their actions were
motivated by "unusual behaviour". He said the SACP had strong reasons to
believe that the banks were under pressure of "serious sanction" being
imposed on them from international and domestic financial regulatory
authorities because of the type of transactions in Oakbay and other Gupta
companies. Cronin said the Guptas had the option of recourse through the
courts if the banks acted illegally.

 

But clearly the Guptas want the matter to be resolved through political
intervention, not through the proper legal channels.

 

Rope COSATU in?

 

The SACP statement did not make it clear what the party would do next to
pursue the issue of state capture. In response to questions, Nzimande said
the principal way forward was mass action. "On state capture, mass action is
important, not palace consultations and engagements. Those are not going to
solve the problems." The party would not give details about whether this
entailed marches to Gupta companies or any place else but said it intended
to rope COSATU into this campaign.

 

While the SACP has been on a crusade against the Guptas and has been
strongly backing Gordhan and the Treasury, COSATU has taken exactly the
opposite position. It will therefore be interesting to see whether the SACP
will be able to convince its labour ally to change its position or whether
they will stay the course alone.

 

Churches?

 

Meanwhile the central committee mandated the SACP secretariat to seek the
assistance of the South African Council of Churches (SACC) to process its
complaints against the Guptas. The SACC has made resources and a legal team
available to deal with the issue of state capture. Because the ANC national
executive committee decided to abort the investigation led by its
secretary-general Gwede Mantashe into the matter, the SACP has been forced
to look elsewhere for help. It is perhaps ironic that the party will look to
the churches for help when it has previously been critical of civil society
organisations intervening in political issues.

 

No matter how much the SACP tries to duck and dive around the issue, the
fact that they are pursuing the state capture matter, and the Guptas in
particular, sets them on a collision course with the president. Zuma
definitively rubbished the concept of state capture when he spoke at the
Gauteng provincial general council last month, saying those who were raising
it were "misleading people".

 

Impression?

 

Nzimande says it is not only the president but others in the ANC who were
also disputing that state capture existed. He said the SACP had been under
the impression they were all in agreement at last year's alliance summit
about the existence and pervasive effect of state capture.

 

"We don't want to come across as if we are attacking the president,"
Nzimande said, explaining that the SACP would seek to discuss the matter
with the ANC.

 

When the long-awaited bilateral meeting between the ANC and SACP eventually
does take place, there are bound to be some awkward moments in the
discussions. While the SACP does not want to point fingers at the president
publicly, it remains to be seen whether they will do so to his face.

 

The SACP will effectively be asking Zuma to choose between them and the
Guptas. It could prove to be a costly gamble on their part.

 

 

From:
http://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2016-06-06-get-guptas-duck-zuma-sacps
-obstacle-race-on-state-capture/#.V1UP5vl9600

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/yclsa-eom-forum/005401d1bfbc%24f8fa11b0%24eaee3510%24%40com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to