Communist Parties and Parliamentarism

 

Part 2

 

 

Dominic Tweedie, Johannesburg, 5 March 2005 (edited)

 

In terms of South Africa today, it follows that:

 

.    The main revolutionary struggle will be outside parliament

 

.    The number of seats held by communists is not crucial

 

.    The question of parliamentary representation is not worth a risk of a
split in the ranks of the liberation movement as a whole

 

.    The ANC/SACP/COSATU Alliance must not be broken.

 

 

The first impression given by the theses of the 2CCI, and by Lenin in "What
Is To Be Done?" is very different from our practice today, especially as
expressed in Rule 6.5 of the SACP constitution, which says:

 

"6.5 Members active in fraternal organisations or in any sector of the mass
movement have a duty to set an example of loyalty, hard work and zeal in the
performance of their duties and shall be bound by the discipline and
decisions of such organisations and the movement. They shall not create or
participate in SACP caucuses within such organisations and the movement
designed to influence either elections or policies. The advocacy of SACP
policy on any question relating to the internal affairs of any such
organisations or the movement shall be by open public statements or at joint
meetings between representatives of the SACP and such organisations or the
movement."

 

The insistence on direct control of parliamentarians and the leadership of
mass movements (including Trade Unions) by the central organs of the
Communist party is, clearly, no longer maintained.

 

On the contrary, it is a point of Party discipline (see rule 6.5) that no
such thing must be allowed to happen. Nor can there be private caucuses of
SACP members in mass organisations. Party members must advocate their
positions openly, and then must accept the majority decision of the mass
organisation. This is a correct and practical rule, and it should not be
changed. It should be interpreted to cover parliament.

 

Parliament should be treated as a mass organisation. Party members in
parliament will be bound by its decisions for as long as they are members,
that is to say, unless they resign.

 

Of course, party members are ultimately under the central discipline of the
Party. If they are required to resign, they must do so. In the mean time,
and for as long as they are elected, they must follow the discipline of the
mass organisations in which they work, in this case parliament.

 

It is more than seventy years since the Comintern was disbanded. Communists
are no longer of the view that the instrument of working class power
following the overthrow of the bourgeoisie will only be a soviet republic.
It may take a different form.

 

The proletarian revolution will be made by the masses and must result in the
rule of the working class. The action of the masses in the present time is
through mass organisations which are guided by the vanguard party, but only
to the extent that party leadership is accepted. This principle is enshrined
in rule 6.5.

 

The mass organisations of today will become the instruments of tomorrow's
revolution, and the revolutionary institutions will then form the basis of
socialist organisation after the revolution. Parliament will be one among
many such organisations feeding into the revolutionary crucible. The 2CCI
Theses are correct that parliamentary power as conceived in a bourgeois
constitution must come to an end. Parliament cannot give us revolution. 

 

Revolution will not preserve the bourgeois constitution, and therefore
parliament's special status will disappear.

 

The communists should be present in parliament to give leadership, as they
would be present in any other formation of society. They do not seek a
majority. They are in an alliance and wish to remain in that alliance, with
the ANC, COSATU and SANCO. 

 

Therefore the SACP will not be able to stand candidates unilaterally. They
will have to persuade the ANC that having SACP members, as such, elected to
parliament is in the best interest of the country, of parliament, of the
alliance as a whole, and therefore of the ANC itself.

 

Next: The vanguard and the mass

 

 

VC

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-- 
-- 
You are subscribed. This footer can help you.
Please POST your comments to [email protected] or reply to this 
message.
You can visit the group WEB SITE at 
http://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum for different delivery options, 
pages, files and membership.
To UNSUBSCRIBE, please email [email protected] . You 
don't have to put anything in the "Subject:" field. You don't have to put 
anything in the message part. All you have to do is to send an e-mail to this 
address (repeat): [email protected] .
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"YCLSA Discussion Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send an email to [email protected].
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/yclsa-eom-forum.
To view this discussion on the web, visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/yclsa-eom-forum/004201d1c637%24672390a0%24356ab1e0%24%40com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to