On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 19:40, Sumit Garg via lists.yoctoproject.org <sumit.garg=linaro....@lists.yoctoproject.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 14:57, Ryan Harkin <ryan.har...@linaro.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sat, 1 Aug 2020 at 10:09, Ryan Harkin <ryan.har...@linaro.org> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Khem, > >> > >> On Fri, 31 Jul 2020, 21:58 Khem Raj, <raj.k...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > >>> On Fri, Jul 31, 2020 at 8:35 AM Ryan Harkin <ryan.har...@linaro.org> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >>> > Hello, > >>> > > >>> > I'm migrating from Warrior to Dunfell and I'm getting a curious build > >>> > failure in gcc-sanitizers. > >>> > > >>> > Here's the full gory detail: > >>> > https://pastebin.ubuntu.com/p/nh4cDKMvgS/ > >>> > > >>> > However, the main error is this: > >>> > > >>> > | In file included from > >>> > ../../../../../../../../../work-shared/gcc-arm-8.3-r2019.03/git/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc:193: > >>> > | > >>> > ../../../../../../../../../work-shared/gcc-arm-8.3-r2019.03/git/libsanitizer/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_internal_defs.h:317:72: > >>> > error: size of array 'assertion_failed__1152' is negative > >>> > | typedef char IMPL_PASTE(assertion_failed_##_, > >>> > line)[2*(int)(pred)-1] > >>> > > >>> > I have no idea where to begin with this. I don't even know why > >>> > gcc-sanitizers is included in the build, what it does, or why I need > >>> > it. I'm building an image with dev packages and gcc, so I guess that's > >>> > why. > >>> > > >>> > I've hacked meta-arm to patch sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cc to > >>> > null out the macros and that builds fine. I'm sure it won't work, > >>> > should someone want to use it, mind you. > >>> > > >>> > Is there something obvious that I should be doing as part of a Warrior > >>> > -> Dunfell migration to get this to work? > >>> > > >>> > note: Warrior used meta-linaro-toolchain and for Dunfell, it's moved to > >>> > meta-arm-toolchain. > >>> > > >>> > >>> is gcc 8.3 the latest for linaro > >> > >> > >> I assume so. I haven't attempted to change the default. > > > > > > I'm sorry, that's incorrect: local.conf has an over-ride to specify 8.3. > > I've just removed it and now it's using 9.3. And it's building fine. > >
It's using GCC 9.3 from OE core. If you wish to use Arm toolchain then you need to override the default OE core GCC version with Arm toolchain GCC version: GCCVERSION = "arm-9.2" -Sumit > > Sumit, do you know if there's a reason for using 9.2 in RPB instead of 9.3? > > > > Arm GCC 9.3 toolchain isn't released yet (see here [1]). > > [1] > https://developer.arm.com/tools-and-software/open-source-software/developer-tools/gnu-toolchain/gnu-a/downloads > > -Sumit > > >> > >>> > >>> > Regards, > >>> > Ryan. > >>> > >
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#50162): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/50162 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/75909560/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
