On 01/18/2012 10:25 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 10:15 AM, William Mills <wmi...@ti.com
<mailto:wmi...@ti.com>> wrote:
On 01/18/2012 10:04 AM, James Abernathy wrote:
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: *William Mills* <wmi...@ti.com <mailto:wmi...@ti.com>
<mailto:wmi...@ti.com <mailto:wmi...@ti.com>>>
Date: Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [yocto] build failure on ubuntu 64bits development
system
To: Gary Thomas <g...@mlbassoc.com <mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com>
<mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com <mailto:g...@mlbassoc.com>>>
Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>
<mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>__>
On 01/18/2012 09:51 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
On 2012-01-18 07 <tel:2012-01-18%2007> <tel:2012-01-18%2007>:42,
James Abernathy wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:30 AM, James Abernathy
<jfaberna...@gmail.com <mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com>
<mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com <mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com>>
<mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com <mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com>
<mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com <mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com>>__>__>
wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 7:55 AM, James Abernathy
<jfaberna...@gmail.com <mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com>
<mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com <mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com>>
<mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com <mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com>
<mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com <mailto:jfaberna...@gmail.com>>__>__>
wrote:
I just built a new development pc and installed Ubuntu 11.10
x64. I wonder if there are any new requirements to building
Yocto in that environment? I got an error right
off, but then it complete the first 63 task and stopped
successfully. error below:
jim@ubuntu:~/poky/build-cdv$ bitbake core-image-sato
Pseudo is not present but is required, building this first
before the main build
Parsing recipes: 100%
|#############################____####################| Time:
00:00:25
Parsing of 797 .bb files complete (0 cached, 797 parsed). 1037
targets, 22 skipped, 0 masked, 0 errors.
ERROR: Execution of event handler 'run_buildstats' failed
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "run_buildstats(e)", line 18, in
run_buildstats(e=<bb.event.____BuildStarted object at 0x4c338d0>)
File "buildstats.bbclass", line 21, in
set_device(e=<bb.event.____BuildStarted object at 0x4c338d0>)
UnboundLocalError: local variable 'rdev' referenced before
assignment
Any ideas?
JIm A
I went back and tried using the tarballs for poky edison and
cedartrail bsp and the errors don't occur. So I'm guessing the
issue isn't related to Ubuntu 32 vs. 64 bit.
I spoke too soon. Same error in edison tarballs. I looked at the
code and I can see an place were rdev could go un assigned. If
you fell out of the for loop without passing any of
the if conditions, rdev would be unassigned. That must be what
is happening in Ubuntu 11.10 x64
Anybody building with Ubuntu 11.10 x64? This doesn't happen on x32
Jim A
def set_device(e):
tmpdir = bb.data.getVar('TMPDIR', e.data, True)
try:
os.remove(bb.data.getVar('____DEVFILE', e.data, True))
except:
pass
##############################____############################__##__################
# We look for the volume TMPDIR lives on. To do all disks would
make little
# sense and not give us any particularly useful data. In theory
we could do
# something like stick DL_DIR on a different partition and this
would
# throw stats gathering off. The same goes with SSTATE_DIR.
However, let's
# get the basics in here and work on the cornercases later.
##############################____############################__##__################
device=os.stat(tmpdir)
majordev=os.major(device.st_____dev)
minordev=os.minor(device.st_____dev)
for line in open("/proc/diskstats", "r"):
if majordev == int(line.split()[0]) and minordev ==
int(line.split()[1]):
rdev=line.split()[2]
file = open(bb.data.getVar('DEVFILE', e.data, True), "w")
file.write(rdev)
file.close()
Can you show what the differences are between /proc/diskstats
on the two systems? That's obviously what's causing the error.
If your build dir is encyptfs or a fuse device or anything that
is not a
direct block device you will get this error. This is to be fixed in
1.1.1 but encyptfs will still have other problems.
I build the Ubuntu 11.10 x64 system with 2 drives setup as Soft
RAID 0.
I picked btrfs as the file system for no particular reason.
Should I go
back to ext4 or is RAID 0 the problem?
No, I would not do that yet. I would think software RAID would
present a block device so would not trigger this error.
I was hoping to use RAID 0 for speed. I have a I7 2700K on a DZ68DB with
2 6Gb/s ports matched to 2 6Gb/s 7200 hard drives. Since the builds take
so long, I was looking for an edge.
So are there any recommendations at this point? I'm assuming that the
default ext4 directly on the SATA drive is a fall back position.
Advice?
If it were me, I would instrument (hack) that code above to see what
part is failing. Are you getting the right dev major/ minor from the
stat code or is the /proc/diskstats search code failing.
Alternatively you could try the 1.1.1 branch to see if that fixes it.
Jim A
> 9 0 md0 133691 0 2218832 0 67133 0 5629616 0 0 0 0
> 9 1 md1 235 0 1880 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Your build dir is in md0 or md1 (wrt your other post)
JIm A
___________________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>
<mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>__>
https://lists.yoctoproject.____org/listinfo/yocto
<https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto
<https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto>>
_________________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org <mailto:yocto@yoctoproject.org>
https://lists.yoctoproject.__org/listinfo/yocto
<https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto>
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
