Hi Paul, > > For example parsing libav and rpi-zram-service will fail. We don't > > have libav and we don't have systemd yet in poky. > > OK, sure, that isn't ideal - however meta-ti suffers from this issue as well, > and they have instructions in the layer README which tell people the > BBMASK they can use to fix it. Can we not do the same here?
That had been my plan but I got the impression that was frowned up in the Yocto environment. As mentioned before I develop with core OE and Angstrom so to date had not worried about Yocto specific problems as it is not a distro I use in anger. If anyone wants to chuck patches over for this that is grand. Or if Andrei wants to maintain floating patches over my tree, that is also fine, it makes little odds to me or my current use case. Regards, John _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto