Thanks, Tom, FWIW, I did try to confirm by renaming and running my build, but I ran into another issue not apparently related to the BSP that deserves its own thread.
John On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Tom Zanussi <tom.zanu...@intel.com> wrote: > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 10:01 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 10:21 -0400, r10kindsofpeople wrote: > > > I've been working with denzil, but decided to try and upgrade to > > > dylan... > > > > > > > > > Downloading and installing poky-dylan-9.0.1.tar.bz2 went fine. > > > Finding and downloading meta-crownbay-dylan-9.0.0.tar.bz2 was easy > > > enough. > > > > > > > > > But neither of these give me meta-intel. > > > > > > > Actually, what's in the meta-crownbay-dylan tarball is meta-intel, with > > just the meta-crownbay BSP included. But it looks like there's a > > problem with the naming of the top-level directory in the tarball: > > > > $ ls meta-crownbay > > binary common conf MAINTAINERS meta-crownbay meta-tlk README > > > > whereas after untarring, I should have been able to do: > > > > $ ls meta-intel > > binary common conf MAINTAINERS meta-crownbay meta-tlk README > > > > Beth or Nitin, can you please fix the tarballs so that the top-level > > directory isn't the meta-BSPname but meta-intel (like they are for the > > previous releases). > > > > > > > > So the central question is: how do I find and download a released > > > package that contains meta-intel that's required by meta-crownbay? A > > > > If you just rename the top-level directory to meta-intel rather than > > meta-crownbay, things should be fine.. > > > > Filed bug 4868 for this. > > https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=4868 > > Tom > > > > second question is whether I'd have had problems anyway, given that > > > dylan is 9.0.1 and the BSP is 9.0.0. > > > > > > > No, you shouldn't have problems - a given BSP should be good for the > > same major release and all its point releases... > > > > Thanks, > > > > Tom > > > > > > > > I can do a git of meta-intel, but that apparently gives me a snapshot > > > that doesn't play well with the released poky. I can do a git of > > > poky, then a git of meta-intel...I still needed to do a bit of > > > tweaking but I could bitbake core-image-minimal. Now I'm having > > > problems with adt_install, apparently because the scripts all think my > > > release is 1.4+snapshot, which breaks the repository links and the > > > opkg install. I seem to have gotten around these, too, but if someone > > > has something for me to test using released packages, I'm willing, at > > > the moment, to start from scratch. > > > > > > > > > John > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > yocto mailing list > > > yocto@yoctoproject.org > > > https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > > > > >
_______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto