On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Alex J Lennon <
ajlen...@dynamicdevices.co.uk> wrote:

>
> On 11/06/2014 18:24, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 11:19 AM, Alex J Lennon <
> ajlen...@dynamicdevices.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/06/2014 08:47, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 2:27 AM, Alex J Lennon <
>> ajlen...@dynamicdevices.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 10/06/2014 19:59, Andrei Gherzan wrote:
>>>
>>>  Hello Alex.
>>>
>>> On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 1:50 PM, Alex J Lennon <
>>> ajlen...@dynamicdevices.co.uk> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This changes the build slightly as there are some #ifdefs in there for
>>>> Raspberry Pi.
>>>>
>>>> Also the codec configuration file used by gstreamer1.0-omx codecs,
>>>> /etc/xdg/gstomx.conf,  is set correctly to
>>>> core-name=/usr/lib/libopenmaxil.so
>>>>
>>>> Change-Id: I2352ecabfd053717d9ccd2d22422e7d4b7588ce4
>>>> Signed-off-by: Alex J Lennon <ajlen...@dynamicdevices.co.uk>
>>>> ---
>>>>  recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-omx.inc            | 2 ++
>>>>  recipes-multimedia/gstreamer/gstreamer1.0-omx_1.0.0.bbappend | 1 +
>>>>
>>>
>>>  I was thinking we we really need two files for this... I know that
>>> yocto has an inc too. But i don't know if that really makes sense for one
>>> line. What do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  I came across Yocto best practice here. This is more or less why I
>>> provided a patch for consideration into Poky on this earlier today. It
>>> would help me, and I suspect other newbies, to have best practice
>>> expectations on how to put patches together somewhere up front, say in the
>>> README.
>>>
>>> "Do not merge .inc / .bb files"
>>>
>>>
>>> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Best_Known_Methods_(BKMs)_for_Package_Updating
>>>
>>
>>  I understand. But I think that this is the case only for bb files. We
>> are talking here about a bbappend in which case this would be pretty
>> useless. Nobody reuses an inc for a bbappend - never seen something like
>> that.
>>
>>
>> e.g. I have gstreamer1.0-omx_git.bbappend here which reuses the .inc
>> file. I didn't contribute it as for some reason the git build breaks and I
>> need to look at why this is
>>
>>
>    So, you say that if you merge your inc file in the bbappend one, the
> build breaks? It shouldn't really. I just tested and for me it works.
>
>
> Not quite. I mean that I am reusing the code in the .inc file in another
> .bbappend file, called gstreamer1.0-omx_git.bbappend
>
>
Got it now. Makes sense in this case, agreed.


> This is identical to gstreamer1.0-omx_1.0.0.bbappend in that it just
> requires the inc file, so I don't have duplication of code.
>
> Targetting gstreamer-omx 1.0.0 at the RPi works fine, but when I tried
> targetting the git source at RPi the build broke, so I didn't provide that
> recipe to you.
>
> e.g. with my local.conf set to PREFERRED_VERSION_gstreamer1.0-omx = "git"
> the git build gives this
>
> cc1: error: .../tmp/sysroots/raspberrypi/usr/include/vc: No such file or
> directory [-Werror]
> cc1: error: .../tmp/sysroots/raspberrypi/usr/include/interface: No such
> file or directory [-Werror]
> cc1: error: .../tmp/sysroots/raspberrypi/usr/include/interface/vcos: No
> such file or directory [-Werror]
> cc1: error:
> .../tmp/sysroots/raspberrypi/usr/include/interface/vcos/pthreads: No such
> file or directory $
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[2]: *** [libgstomx_la-gstomxvideoenc.lo] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> I think there's something missing or some path not set correctly for the
> more recent gstreamer-omx code, but I haven't had a chance to look into it.
>
>
> Most probably you mangle some paths there. Needs some investigation.

>   By the way, I would use _append_raspberrypi for this one too.
>
>
>
>
> OK, I just tried this instead of the anonymous python method I created in
> the last patch-set.
>
> Perhaps I'm misunderstanding but, for example, we need
> GSTREAMER_1_0_OMX_TARGET set to 'rpi" when machine is raspberrypi
>
> When I try,
>
> GSTREAMER_1_0_OMX_TARGET_append_raspberrypi = "rpi"
>
> I end up with the original value 'bellagio' appended with 'rpi' to give
> 'bellagiorpi'
>
> Maybe I need something more like this?
>
> GSTREAMER_1_0_OMX_TARGET_override_raspberrypi = "rpi"
>
> Does such a mechanism exist in bitbake?
>
>
Yes. To override a variable you just don't use "append":
VARIABLE_mymachine = "my value"


-- 
*Andrei Gherzan*
m: +40.744.478.414 |  f: +40.31.816.28.12
-- 
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Reply via email to