On 14-12-02 02:37 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote:
[Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes] On 14.12.02 (Tue 14:03) Alexandru
Vaduva wrote:
Hello Bian,
Did you know that the multipath tools recipe was also available inside the
meta-oe and meta-virtualization?
I do not have any problems with it being available in meta-cgl. I just wanted
to hear other opinions because I would like to make sure we do not get to that
point where we keep various versions of various recipes in a variety of places.
It will be a nightmare to work with them in the future.
I completely agree, and I that's mostly the consensus of the community.
Since meta-cgl already has dependencies on both meta-virtualization and
meta-oe, I think it makes the most sense to try to keep updates for the
multipath recipes in one or both of those layers. My recommendation
would be to update the meta-oe one as it has broader applicability, but
of course that's up to the submitter and the layer maintainers to
decide. It may be that it's appropriate to maintain a bbappend for the
recipe in meta-cgl, but I think it'd be good to send it for inclusion in
meta-oe first.
I'm with Joe on this one.
I only did a really quick check on the history of the two copies
that we have, but I see the meta-virt variant was added in January 2013
and what could be the first version in meta-oe in March the same year.
The layer index may not have been as helpful back then (but honestly
I can't recall) .. either way we failed to coordinate as a wider community
and managed to end up with two different recipes in the layers.
There's no sense making this any worse than it already is, so I'd say
that we could spend the time looking at the two (three?) recipes, and
get a consolidated variant in meta-oe, and I'd be happy to drop the
one in meta-virtualization and bbappend the same way that Joe suggests.
Thoughts ? We should figure out if someone is going to take a crack
at it, so we don't all go do the same thing :)
Bruce
Just my thoughts on it.
-J.
Once again, just to make it clear. I am ok with the patches, I will merge all
three of them (corosync, multipath and drbd) but I just wanted to make sure you
took this into consideration.
Also I like the idea of having drbd recipe inside and the fact that you like to
get involved in this initiative.
Hope to hear more from you and also that I will be able to help more.
Alex Vaduva
On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:07 AM, Bian Naimeng <bia...@cn.fujitsu.com>
wrote:
Bian Naimeng (2):
[meta-cgl] device-mapper-multipath: add recipe
[meta-cgl]drbd: add recipe
.../device-mapper-multipath/multipathd.init.patch | 12 +++++
.../device-mapper-multipath_0.5.0.bb | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++
meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd/drbd.service | 12 +++++
meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd_8.4.4.bb | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 134 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/device-mapper-multipath/
device-mapper-multipath/multipathd.init.patch
create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/device-mapper-multipath/
device-mapper-multipath_0.5.0.bb
create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd/drbd.service
create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd_8.4.4.bb
--
1.9.1
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
--
_______________________________________________
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
