[Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes] On 14.12.02 (Tue 14:49) Bruce Ashfield wrote:
> On 14-12-02 02:37 PM, Joe MacDonald wrote: > >[Re: [yocto] [PATCH 0/2] Add some recipes] On 14.12.02 (Tue 14:03) Alexandru > >Vaduva wrote: > > > >>Hello Bian, > >> > >>Did you know that the multipath tools recipe was also available inside the > >>meta-oe and meta-virtualization? > >>I do not have any problems with it being available in meta-cgl. I just > >>wanted > >>to hear other opinions because I would like to make sure we do not get to > >>that > >>point where we keep various versions of various recipes in a variety of > >>places. > >>It will be a nightmare to work with them in the future. > > > >I completely agree, and I that's mostly the consensus of the community. > >Since meta-cgl already has dependencies on both meta-virtualization and > >meta-oe, I think it makes the most sense to try to keep updates for the > >multipath recipes in one or both of those layers. My recommendation > >would be to update the meta-oe one as it has broader applicability, but > >of course that's up to the submitter and the layer maintainers to > >decide. It may be that it's appropriate to maintain a bbappend for the > >recipe in meta-cgl, but I think it'd be good to send it for inclusion in > >meta-oe first. > > I'm with Joe on this one. > > I only did a really quick check on the history of the two copies > that we have, but I see the meta-virt variant was added in January 2013 > and what could be the first version in meta-oe in March the same year. I actually intended to say "update the meta-oe one as it has broader applicability and if you're feeling ambitious, send the same update to meta-virtualization" since I thought meta-virt didn't have dependencies on meta-oe and I can see an argument in favour of keeping a separate recipe if you're keeping the layer contained. But it looks like that's not the case, so consolidation makes sense here. > The layer index may not have been as helpful back then (but honestly > I can't recall) .. either way we failed to coordinate as a wider community > and managed to end up with two different recipes in the layers. > > There's no sense making this any worse than it already is, so I'd say > that we could spend the time looking at the two (three?) recipes, and > get a consolidated variant in meta-oe, and I'd be happy to drop the > one in meta-virtualization and bbappend the same way that Joe suggests. > > Thoughts ? We should figure out if someone is going to take a crack > at it, so we don't all go do the same thing :) It's not on my to-do list, so don't worry about me running in parallel. iscsi was (and is again) the only meta-networking one and libcap-ng (as discussed with Armin the other day) and swig are the meta-selinux ones. -J. > > Bruce > > > > > > >Just my thoughts on it. > >-J. > > > >>Once again, just to make it clear. I am ok with the patches, I will merge > >>all > >>three of them (corosync, multipath and drbd) but I just wanted to make sure > >>you > >>took this into consideration. > >>Also I like the idea of having drbd recipe inside and the fact that you > >>like to > >>get involved in this initiative. > >>Hope to hear more from you and also that I will be able to help more. > >> > >> > >>Alex Vaduva > >> > >> > >>On Tuesday, December 2, 2014 10:07 AM, Bian Naimeng <bia...@cn.fujitsu.com> > >>wrote: > >> > >> > >>Bian Naimeng (2): > >> [meta-cgl] device-mapper-multipath: add recipe > >> [meta-cgl]drbd: add recipe > >> > >>.../device-mapper-multipath/multipathd.init.patch | 12 +++++ > >>.../device-mapper-multipath_0.5.0.bb | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++ > >>meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd/drbd.service | 12 +++++ > >>meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd_8.4.4.bb | 57 > >>++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>4 files changed, 134 insertions(+) > >>create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/device-mapper-multipath/ > >>device-mapper-multipath/multipathd.init.patch > >>create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/device-mapper-multipath/ > >>device-mapper-multipath_0.5.0.bb > >>create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd/drbd.service > >>create mode 100644 meta-cgl-common/recipes-cgl/drbd/drbd_8.4.4.bb > >> > >>-- > >>1.9.1 > >> > >>-- > >>_______________________________________________ > >>yocto mailing list > >>yocto@yoctoproject.org > >>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- -Joe MacDonald. :wq
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto